The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning
Item
-
Title
-
The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning
-
ABP identifier
-
ABP-W-0025
-
Date
-
1988
-
Type
-
Book
-
Description
-
Jonsen and Toulmin recovered casuistry from its reputation as clever rationalization by reconstructing a tradition of reasoning from paradigmatic cases, circumstances, and moral maxims. Their history followed the method from antiquity through medieval and early modern moral theology and argued for its revival in contemporary practical ethics.
-
Intellectual stream
-
Principles & methods
-
Theological ethics
-
Verification status
-
Verified
-
Evidence confidence
-
High
-
Historical significance
-
Jonsen and Toulmin recovered casuistry from its reputation as clever rationalization by reconstructing a tradition of reasoning from paradigmatic cases, circumstances, and moral maxims. Their history followed the method from antiquity through medieval and early modern moral theology and argued for its revival in contemporary practical ethics. The book mattered in bioethics because commissions and clinical consultations often reasoned through cases even when theorists described their work in terms of general principles. It supplied a historical and methodological defense of that practice. In doing so, it sharpened a lasting debate over whether bioethical judgment proceeds chiefly from theory downward or develops through comparison among concrete cases.